Twenty-one years building products and businesses, more than a decade of it in product management, and today leading AI business models at Swiss Post. I stay close to the model, the RAG pipeline and the A/B test, not the roadmap alone. This site is my application for Product Manager, AI at Crypto.com.
This role is about taking an ambiguous AI opportunity, turning it into a real product with a cross-functional squad, and proving it moved a number. That's the work I do now. Here's how it lines up with what you're after.
I'm doing this today: leading AI-driven business models from opportunity to live product, and building my own products end to end with AI workflows. I know what it takes to get a model out of a demo and into something people rely on.
Proof: AI Project Lead for business development at Swiss Post; built Pedal Peak end to end with AI workflows.
I'm a practitioner, not just a sponsor. I prompt, retrieve, ground and chain. I can sit with ML engineers and talk evaluation, hallucination, latency and cost as real constraints, not buzzwords, and make the build-vs-buy call.
Proof: build daily with Claude, GPT and n8n; the AI spec further down this page is mine, architecture and guardrails included.
I've led engineers, designers, analysts and external partners to ship, owning the budget, the KPIs and the hard prioritisation calls. Getting a mixed team to one outcome is the part I'm best at.
Proof: led a cross-functional team and agencies at ifolor; founding team that grew WePractice to 23 people across 10 locations.
As a venture builder and founder I've turned vague opportunities into MVPs, then into phased rollouts that actually ship. I scope to the smallest thing that proves value, then scale what works and kill what doesn't.
Proof: ran market pilots from MVP to launch at Die Mobiliar (Smide, now BOND Mobility); built full go-to-market at Sparrow Ventures and WePractice.
I define success up front and let the experiment decide, comfortable in analytics, SQL-level questions and A/B design. I trust the evidence over the loudest opinion in the room.
Proof: +9% conversion and +15% checkout lift at ifolor through research, A/B testing and analytics on a CHF 100M+ business.
Much of my career has sat inside regulated, money-moving organisations, where safety and compliance are the constraint, not an afterthought. I've made the case to C-level and investors and held the line.
Proof: owned UBS and Baloise partnerships at Brixel; ran innovation inside Die Mobiliar; reported to C-suite at ifolor; raised two rounds.
Product and AI lead in Zurich with over twenty years of experience, more than a decade in product management, open to relocating to Dubai. I turn ambiguous problems into shipped products and measured results, increasingly with AI at the core. German and Swiss German native, English fluent, French conversational.
Jan 2026 to present
Swiss Post, Advertising · Zurich
Oct 2024 to Jul 2025
Ifolor Group · Zurich
Jun 2023 to Sep 2024
Brixel · Zurich
Mar 2020 to May 2023
WePractice · Sparrow Ventures (Migros Group) · Zurich
Sep 2019 to Sep 2022
Sparrow Ventures · Zurich
Jan 2017 to Aug 2019
Die Mobiliar · Bern
Not a slide of buzzwords. A real feature taken the way I'd actually run it: frame the opportunity, make the build-vs-buy call, design the architecture with compliance built in, then ship it in phases against hard metrics. Click through the four steps, and try the pipeline.
Start with the user pain and one number worth moving, not the model. Then write the few hypotheses that decide whether it's worth building.
Most "AI assistant" value is deflecting support tickets and onboarding friction, not flashy advice. The win is resolution rate and time-to-first-trade.
Users trust answers tied to their real balances and the latest data. A fluent but ungrounded model erodes trust fast in a money app.
In crypto the blocker isn't capability, it's safety: no advice that crosses into regulated territory, no hallucinated numbers, full auditability.
The honest default for a v1 is to buy the intelligence and build the product around it. Toggle to see the trade-off I'd weigh.
A RAG pipeline where safety isn't bolted on at the end, it's a step in the flow. Click each stage to see what it does and how it stays compliant.
Define success before launch, roll out behind a flag, and let the A/B test decide whether it scales. Illustrative targets, but this is the shape I'd commit to.
Earn the right to widen at each step. The copilot only graduates a gate when the eval suite, the red-team pass rate and the live metrics all clear. If any one fails, it stays where it is and we fix the cause.
Roughly how I'd spend my first three months as an AI PM at Crypto.com: learn the ground truth, pick the highest-value safe bet, and ship something measurable.